What's the entity type going to stand behind fully autonomous system?

 

The entity standing behind a fully autonomous system of business and military dominating the world would depend on several factors, such as its origin, purpose, and control mechanisms. Here are potential scenarios:

1. National Government

• Description: A national government may develop and control such a system to project power, secure economic dominance, and ensure national security. Governments have the resources, legal frameworks, and geopolitical motivations to create systems of this scale.
• Potential Outcomes:
  • State-led military-industrial complex integrating AI and autonomy.
  • System used for global influence, potentially leading to new forms of imperialism or neo-colonialism.
• Risks: Power concentration in a single government might lead to authoritarian control or global instability.

2. Private Corporation

• Description: A global tech or defense company could spearhead such a system, driven by profit and innovation. Companies like those in big tech or defense sectors have the expertise and infrastructure to build and deploy autonomous systems.
• Potential Outcomes:
  • Corporate hegemony with systems tailored for efficiency and profitability, prioritizing shareholders over global stability.
  • Systems leased or sold to governments, increasing dependency on private entities.
• Risks: Lack of accountability to the public, driven by profit motives, could exacerbate inequality or destabilize global peace.

3. Hybrid Entity (Public-Private Partnership)

• Description: Collaboration between national governments and private corporations could result in such a system, combining governmental authority with private-sector innovation.
• Potential Outcomes:
  • Shared control but potentially conflicting goals between public welfare and corporate profit.
  • Broad deployment for dual-use (civilian and military) purposes.
• Risks: Complex accountability and potential for the system to outgrow its creators' control.

4. Individual or Small Group

• Description: A visionary individual or a highly skilled, clandestine group could develop such a system, leveraging advanced AI and autonomy. Historical examples of individuals pioneering technological revolutions support this scenario.
• Potential Outcomes:
  • Rapid deployment with focused goals (e.g., ideology-driven or philanthropic intent).
  • System prone to ethical biases or vulnerabilities due to lack of diverse oversight.
• Risks: Fragility of control, dependence on the individual's/group’s motivations, and potential for misuse.

5. "Black Group" (Shadow Organization)

• Description: A clandestine, possibly illegal or unaccountable group operating outside the law may create and control such a system for covert operations or global influence.
• Potential Outcomes:
  • Hidden dominance, exploiting weaknesses in global systems.
  • Deployment for self-serving interests like illicit trade, power, or ideological control.
• Risks: Extremely high risk of destabilization, ethical violations, and public unawareness of true control.

6. Decentralized Autonomous System

• Description: A decentralized network, such as a blockchain-driven DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organization), might evolve into an autonomous controlling entity.
• Potential Outcomes:
  • Highly resilient system with no single point of control.
  • Potential alignment with global welfare or collapse into chaotic self-governance.
• Risks: Difficulty in holding accountable, inability to adapt to moral imperatives or legal frameworks.